The documentary related to Gujarat riots against our PM and then CM of Gujarat had lots of hike due to the bold claims in it. BBC launched the documentary, which the government banned from everywhere. Some of the students, official bodies tried to screen it and there was a great debate going on. The same documentary is on hype again.There is a demand for the BBC completely in the Supreme Court. The SC dismissed the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) suit brought by the Hindu Sena seeking to outlaw the British Broadcasting Corporation, this Friday. Plea Against BBC Documentary-Plea Against BBC Documentary
The documentary based on the 2002 Gujarat riots, India: The Modi Question, was the subject of a request for a BBC broadcasting ban by the Hindu Sena.The argument could have been better developed, and the court cannot enforce Censorship, according to a bench made up of Justice Sanjiv Khanna and justice MM Sundresh. The bar informed the petitioner's senior attorney Pinky Anand that the argument was illogical and could not be made. The court questioned how someone could want total Censorship. This is just not acceptable.Then, the council asked that the petitioner be given a chance to speak. The attorney clarified the topic by pointing out that a similar incident occurred with India's Daughter and should be considered. However, the court disregarded the request and rejected it. The court ruled that no time was wasted because the writ plea was utterly absurd. It wasn't very worthy and was thus dismissed. India: The Modi Question, the BBC documentary that gave rise to this controversy, is about the riots in Gujarat in 2002.The documentary looks at the part played by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who was Gujarat's Chief Minister at the time of the riots. The national government blocked the documentary from social media and online distribution, but it has been shown nationwide in several colleges and universities.Vishnu Gupta submitted a petition to the Supreme Court asking for the BBC to be outlawed entirely. Investigation into the situation has been requested because it appears to divide India.The documentary movie allegedly seeks to discredit Narendra Modi through propaganda. Additionally, it is claimed that the BBC created this program as part of a campaign of anti-Hindu misinformation to rip apart India's social structure.Additionally, it was claimed that the BBC had held a negative view of India since its independence. The petitioner contended that action still needed to be taken after requesting the Union Home Ministry on January 27 to outlaw the network. Plea Against BBC Documentary-Plea Against BBC Documentary-Plea Against BBC Documentary
The petitioner asserts that the right to free speech guaranteed by Article 19(1) (a) of the constitution is not unqualified. The same bench had requested a response from the Central government last week in response to appeals contesting government directives that had barred the documentary.For more updates, please keep visiting our website www.topstoriesworld.com, where we provide unbiased, trustworthy, and top stories of the world.
Plea Against BBC Documentary-Plea Against BBC Documentary
The documentary based on the 2002 Gujarat riots, India: The Modi Question, was the subject of a request for a BBC broadcasting ban by the Hindu Sena.
The argument could have been better developed, and the court cannot enforce Censorship, according to a bench made up of Justice Sanjiv Khanna and justice MM Sundresh.
The bar informed the petitioner's senior attorney Pinky Anand that the argument was illogical and could not be made. The court questioned how someone could want total Censorship. This is just not acceptable.
Then, the council asked that the petitioner be given a chance to speak. The attorney clarified the topic by pointing out that a similar incident occurred with India's Daughter and should be considered.
However, the court disregarded the request and rejected it. The court ruled that no time was wasted because the writ plea was utterly absurd.
It wasn't very worthy and was thus dismissed. India: The Modi Question, the BBC documentary that gave rise to this controversy, is about the riots in Gujarat in 2002.
The documentary looks at the part played by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who was Gujarat's Chief Minister at the time of the riots. The national government blocked the documentary from social media and online distribution, but it has been shown nationwide in several colleges and universities.
Vishnu Gupta submitted a petition to the Supreme Court asking for the BBC to be outlawed entirely. Investigation into the situation has been requested because it appears to divide India.
The documentary movie allegedly seeks to discredit Narendra Modi through propaganda. Additionally, it is claimed that the BBC created this program as part of a campaign of anti-Hindu misinformation to rip apart India's social structure.
Additionally, it was claimed that the BBC had held a negative view of India since its independence. The petitioner contended that action still needed to be taken after requesting the Union Home Ministry on January 27 to outlaw the network.
Plea Against BBC Documentary-Plea Against BBC Documentary-Plea Against BBC Documentary
The petitioner asserts that the right to free speech guaranteed by Article 19(1) (a) of the constitution is not unqualified. The same bench had requested a response from the Central government last week in response to appeals contesting government directives that had barred the documentary.
For more updates, please keep visiting our website www.topstoriesworld.com, where we provide unbiased, trustworthy, and top stories of the world.
